Skip to main content

The Burn Up Charts In Scrum By: Namrata Parik

I would like to propose a less-taken path in my maiden article to track the progress in scrum. We usually do it using the burn down chart which is relatively easier to understand as compared to the burn up chart. These charts help the team and stakeholders to see and track the progress at any point in the release process or sprint.
Burn-down chart provides us the information showing the progress based on the remaining hours or story points from top to bottom. (The burn-down chart can be plotted using story points, task count or the remaining effort) This chart is a plot of expected remaining and actual remaining, this is the most used chart in scrum and since it has only two lines it is considered to be a simple chart. It does not cover the scope creep.
So sometimes what might look like ‘no work ‘ done by the team may actually be a result of scope creep.
The chart below reflects that the team has not done any progress in Sprint 5 and 6 as the story points remain the same.
Image source : https://stayrelevant.globant.com
Now coming to the burn-up chart. This chart is a plot of three parameters: scope, expected progress and actual progress.
In the chart below we can see that the real reason was a scope creep as shown by the scope plot

Image source : https://stayrelevant.globant.com
The actual sprint points ( in red) and the estimation at completion cover the scope creep and hence a more clear analysis on the team performance can be made

Image source : https://stayrelevant.globant.com
Burn-up charts allows to divide the scope and the progress which cannot be done in Burn-down as it plots only the expected remaining and actual remaining.
Therefore in teams where tasks of more importance (which cannot be neglected) keep on coming in between the sprint duration, burn up chart can be used to see the real picture.
That being said, in some teams when a new tasks comes, it is added to the sprint and the entire estimation and the burn down chart goes wayward.
That might not be the best practice but still can be a metric for monitoring the progress of the team in real terms.
In the chart below the team started with an estimate of 70 SP and there were a scope creeps which appear as spikes in the graph which can ALSO give an idea on the scope creep in a sprint, but not in the best possible manner

Image source: Google Images
References
  • https://stayrelevant.globant.com
  • https://www.scrumalliance.org

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Agile Story Point Estimation Techniques - T-Shirt Sizing by - Ankur Mistry

In my previous articles, we have discussed  Agile Story Point Estimation  and  Agile Story Point Estimation Techniques - Planning Poker . In this article, we will learn Story Point Estimation using T-Shirt Size Technique. What is T-shirt sizing? T-shirt Sizing is one of the Story points sizing technique to estimate user story usually used in agile projects. It's a relative Estimation Technique. Rather than using a number of planning pokers, here, Items are classified into t-shirt sizes: XS, S, M, L, XL. The term originates from the way T-shirt sizes are indicated in the US. Rather than having T-shirts in sizes 4, 5, 6 etc, there are just a few sizes: Small (S), Medium (M), Large (L) and Extra Large (XL) and so on. With T-shirt measuring, the development team is made a request to evaluate whether they think a story is extra-small, small, medium, large, extra-large, or double extra-large. By expelling the numerical score, the development team is allow...
Post a Comment
Read more

Retrospective Meetings By:Namrata Parik

This article talks about the least important meeting in a Sprint, the retrospective meeting, at  least as considered by the business and sometimes also by the developers. It is often considered to be a waste of time and given the least priority, and sometimes even omitted if there are time constraints. In fact it is the most important meeting but does not show any immediate business value. Talking about my own experience, we were newly into the project and the geek in the team was not getting enough technical tasks to devour, resulting in not so good documentations by him and his general disinterest in the team. This was discussed in the retrospective and his problem was faced, assessed and solved within a span of two weeks (a single Sprint), and he was given enough tasks to fulfill his coding appetite, resulting in better output by the entire team. Talking about retrospective techniques, the most effective way to conduct a retrospective is the Timeline Review. The te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Scrum Framework - 5 Events in Scrum Framework - By Ankur Mistry

In my previous articles, we have discussed  3 Roles  and  3 Artifacts  in Scrum. In this article, we are going to discuss 5 events in the Scrum Framework. There are Five events in Agile Scrum Framework. Sprint Planning Daily Scrum Sprint Review Sprint Retrospective The Sprint ( Figure: Life cycle of Scrum from  http://www.agiletroop.com/product/life-cycle-of-scrum/ ) Sprint Planning  is the event in which the Product Owner presents the ordered product backlog to the development team. As the word suggests, 'Sprint Planning' means we are going to plan the work to be done in the Sprint. There are two main parts - 'What' and 'How'. 'What' can be done in this Sprint? 'How' will the selected work get done? What can be done in the Sprint - In this part, the Product Owner presents the product backlog items with high business value tasks as a first priority to the development team. All team members collaborate to understand ...
1 comment
Read more